“What happened was that Dr. Ball asserted a truth defense. He argued that the hockey stick was a deliberate fraud, something that could be proved if one had access to the data and calculations, in particular the R2 regression analysis, underlying it,” Hinderaker wrote. “Mann refused to produce these documents. He was ordered to produce them by the court and given a deadline. He still refused to produce them, so the court dismissed his case.”
You will not find this in the typical press outlet promoting the consensus propaganda.
Considering how devastating this is to everyone pushing the climate change agenda, another perspective on this court decision is warranted. Will anyone of them admit that the whole thing is fraudulent, or will they now attempt an end run around Mann’s disgrace by parading Saint Greta in front of the credulous and gullible?